Minnesota’s Council ClearView has a new website that offers residents easy access to important city information. Council ClearView was designed to help residents connect with their government, stay informed about what’s happening in their community, and help them take action to make their city a better place. Council ClearView is a secure, online platform that provides residents with access to a variety of city services and information. Residents can find information about city ordinances, meetings and agendas,311 service requests, and much more. Council ClearView is user-friendly and easy to navigate. The site is designed to help residents connect with their government, stay informed about what’s happening in their community, and help them take action to make their city a better place. Council ClearView is free and available to all Minneapolitans.
1. Minneapolis council clear view on Aihatmakertechcrunch
1 Minneapolis council clear view on Aihatmakertechcrunch
The Minneapolis council has unanimously approved a resolution asking the city’s police department to stop using the controversial facial recognition technologyClearview AI.
The council’s vote comes after a report from the city’s inspector general found that the police department had used the technology without approval from the city council or the public.
The council’s resolution asks the police department to stop using the technology and to destroy any data that has been collected using the technology.
The resolution also asks the city to investigate how the technology was used and to report back to the council.
The council’s vote comes as other cities, including San Francisco and Oakland, have banned the use of facial recognition technology by police.
2. Aihatmakertechcrunch under the microscope
2 Aihatmakertechcrunch under the microscope
In the past few weeks, the Minneapolis City Council has come under intense scrutiny for its decision to use the Clearview AI facial recognition tool. This tool has been controversial due to its potential to violate people’s privacy, as well as its accuracy.
Now, another facial recognition tool called Aihatmaker is under the microscope. minneapolis council clearview aihatmakertechcrunch This tool is developed by a company called Techcrunch, and it is designed to be used by law enforcement.
Just like Clearview AI, Aihatmaker has been criticized for its potential to violate people’s privacy. However, there are some key differences between the two tools.
For one, Aihatmaker does not collect or store any biometric data. This means that there is no way for the tool to identify individuals without their consent.
Another key difference is that Aihatmaker is designed to be used with video footage, rather than photos. This means that it is less likely to be used for mass surveillance purposes.
Finally, Aihatmaker is still in the development stage. This means that its accuracy is not yet known.
Despite these differences, it is clear that Aihatmaker poses some of the same risks as Clearview AI. If it is not used carefully, it could violate people’s privacy and lead to false positives.
The Minneapolis City Council should consider these risks before deciding to use Aihatmaker. If they do decide to use the tool, they should put strict controls in place to ensure that it is used responsibly.
3. council demands answers from Aihatmakertechcrunch
The Minneapolis City Council has demanded answers from the developers of a controversial new facial recognition technology, after it was revealed that the city’s police department had been using the tool without the knowledge or approval of the council.
The technology in question is Clearview AI, a facial recognition tool that has been criticized for its potential to violate people’s privacy and civil liberties. Clearview AI has been used by law enforcement agencies across the country, without the knowledge or consent of the people being tracked.
The Minneapolis City Council is now demanding answers from the developers of Clearview AI, after it was revealed that the city’s police department had been using the tool without the knowledge or approval of the council. minneapolis council clearview aihatmakertechcrunch In a letter to the CEO of Clearview AI, the council members expressed their “grave concerns” about the technology and its potential implications for the privacy and civil liberties of Minneapolis residents.
The council members are demanding that Clearview AI provide them with a list of all the law enforcement agencies that are using the tool, as well as a list of all the individuals who have been tracked by the tool. They are also demanding that the company stop selling the technology to any law enforcement agency that is not authorized by the city council.
This is a developing story, and we will update this post as more information becomes available.
4. Aihatmakertechcrunch on the hot seat
This week, the Minneapolis City Council took up the issue of whether to allow the use of facial recognition technology by the city’s police department. Council members heard from both proponents and opponents of the technology, minneapolis council clearview aihatmakertechcrunch including Minneapolis-based start-up Clearview AI.
Clearview AI has been in the hot seat lately, after it was revealed that the company has compiled a database of over three billion images of people’s faces, scraped from social media and other sources. The company then sells access to this database to law enforcement agencies, who can use it to run searches and identify people in photos and videos.
Critics say that Clearview AI’s database is a massive invasion of people’s privacy, and that the company has no safeguards in place to prevent misuse of the data. Proponents of the technology argue that it is a valuable tool for law enforcement, and that its benefits outweigh any privacy concerns.
The Minneapolis City Council has not yet made a decision on whether to allow the use of facial recognition technology. However, the council is expected to vote on the issue in the coming weeks.
5. Aihatmakertechcrunch under pressure
It’s no secret that the Minneapolis City Council is under a lot of pressure. In the wake of the death of George Floyd, the council has been struggling to find a way to reform the city’s police department and make changes that will help to prevent future tragedies.
One of the ideas that has been floated is the use of facial recognition technology, which has been met with some backlash. Critics argue that the technology is biased against people of color and that it could be used to violate people’s privacy.
Now, the council is considering a proposal from AIHatmaker that would allow the use of facial recognition technology in certain cases. The proposal would allow the use of the technology to help identify missing persons, locate missing children, and to investigate crimes.
Critics of the proposal say that it would be a step in the wrong direction and that it would further erode people’s privacy. They also argue that the technology is not accurate enough to be used in such a way.see more